Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Li Lu on BYD

Courtesy of Street Capitalist:

Question via Columbia University:

So I did some research on lithium ion batteries, and I saw that BYD has a manufacturing advantage with consumer batteries. But I saw that automobile batteries are much more complex. I did not think that the idea of a good consumer battery manufacturer + an automobile maker made much sense.

So when Buffett looked at the stock maybe it was a better deal but today it is this dream of vehicles that is really priced in.

  • It does not feel like a good value investor stock. So why would you own it today?



Li Lu:

Well that is interesting. One of the most fascinating things about being an investor is that surprises are part of the game. When you get into situations like BYD, you see lots of good surprises.

Chuanfu and his team have this fabulous culture, everything people thought they knew turned out to be a few years late. He got into battery manufacturing in that particular way because he really had no other option. He had no money, he only had $300,000 in venture capital funding before IPO and that was it. He raised money in an IPO and Buffett gave him $200M, now they have 160,000 employees. $6-7B in revenues, $500M in net profit. It is amazing.

[Reflections comment: BYD had approximately $4B in revenues at the time of Berkshire Hathaway's investment, and was priced at about 12x trailing earnings. Berkshire Hathaway bought a 10% stake for $230 million, implying a cost basis that is roughly 4x recent earnings -- with an interesting set of tire-tracks.]

So he has this ability to adapt in a competitive environment. He has demonstrated that ability again again and again. The way he does automation is far cheaper than anyone else and more reliable. He continues to surprise me with his ingenuity, to figure out ways to do something better than everyone else. What he is currently doing is very different than what everyone else has done. At the end of the day, you might look at what he has done.


So how do you look at it as an investor with imperfect information? Well I suggest you look at what he has accomplished. 8 years ago I had no idea they would go into the automobile or laptop or cellphone battery business. So that demonstrates how he is. This investment is not easy to understand because it is changing so fast, at such a large scale. An almost unheard of speed. Their manufacturing capabilities will double soon. This year they will hire 10,000 college graduates, 8 or 9 thousand engineers. The scale is almost unparalleled.

  • So this is why the study of history, of all the great corporations will give you a good insight in seeing what will happen with BYD. I suggested that we start with GM and analyze its performance every 5 years for 100 years to understand at least one aspect of BYD’s business.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

The Latticework of Bounded Rationality?

First, an excerpt from this story:

Heckmann is no stranger to deal-making. As CEO of United States Filter, a rollup sold in 1999 to Vivendi for $5 billion, he did more than 300 deals. In 2008, when he paid more than $600 million for China Water & Drinks—a bottled water maker—Heckmann thought he knew what he was doing. China Water was a reverse merger via UGODs, a Nevada shell. Heckmann hired two bulge bracket investment banks, a leading law firm and a large accounting firm to dig into the company.

As much as they dug, however, he claims he was bamboozled. Now the two sides are engaged in a legal battle: The founder of China Water, Xu Hong Bin, claims he is owed money by Heckmann; Heckmann Corp., in a counterclaim, insists that it had become the victim of “financial misconduct.”

When I asked Heckmann whether he would be leery of Chinese reverse mergers, he said that he wouldn’t avoid just reverse mergers, but all Chinese companies, because it’s simply too hard to determine the real numbers.


Second, the bounded rationality solution to Professor Bakshi's riddle:


...by choosing all red I was sure that I'll right in 60% of cases. i do take risk but only when i understand the risk and if the reward are commensurate to that extra risk. the given case was just too complex for me to calculate the probabilities and see if I can increase my chances of success. even if I could have calculated all those probabilities, I didn't have that much time. so the best option for me was to choose all red and be happy with 60% success rate.

PS: I do have the ability to break the password of an excel file and thus could have increased my success rate to 100%. but again the reward for that extra effort wasn't there and thus...

Who are the Intelligent Investors of China?

More suggestions? Please shoot over an email! Shai@DardashtiCapital.com

Fully Translated: Li Lu's Foreword to Poor Charlie's Almanack

A full translation of Li Lu's Foreword to Poor Charlie's Almanack is shared courtesy of Enoch Ko and friends:
Brief Excerpt:

Seven years after we’ve known each other, at a Thanksgiving gathering in 2003, we had a long heart-to-heart conversation. I introduced every single company I have invested in, or researched, or am interested in to Charlie and he commented on each one of them. I also asked for his advice on the problems I’ve encountered. Towards the end, he told me that the problems I’ve encountered were practically all the problems of Wall Street. The problem is with the way the Wall Street thinks. Even though Berkshire Hathaway has been such a success, there isn’t any company on Wall Street that truly imitates it. If I continue on this path, my worries will never be eliminated. But if I was willing to give up this path right then, to take a path different from Wall Street, he was willing to invest. This really flattered me.

Comments? Corrections? Enoch can be reached at: contact@enochko.com

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Fortune Magazine: The $600 billion challenge

The IRS facts for 2007 show that the 400 biggest taxpayers had a total adjusted income of $138 billion, and just over $11 billion was taken as a charitable deduction, a proportion of about 8%. The amount deducted, we need quickly to add, must be adjusted upward because it would have been limited for certain gifts, among them very large ones such as Buffett's $1.8 billion donation that year to the Gates Foundation. Even so, it is hard to imagine the $11 billion rising, by any means, to more than $15 billion. If we accept $15 billion as a reasonable estimate, that would mean that the 400 biggest taxpayers gave 11% of their income to charity -- just a bit more than tithing.

Is it possible that annual giving misses the bigger picture? One could imagine that the very rich build their net worth during their lifetimes and then put large charitable bequests into their wills. Estate tax data, unfortunately, make hash of that scenario, as 2008 statistics show. The number of taxpayers making estate tax filings that year was 38,000, and these filers had gross estates totaling $229 billion. Four-fifths of those taxpayers made no charitable bequests at death. The 7,214 who did make bequests gave $28 billion. And that's only 12% of the $229 billion gross estate value posted by the entire 38,000.

All told, the data suggest that there is a huge gap between what the very rich are giving now and what the Gateses and Buffett would like to suggest is appropriate -- that 50%, or better, of net worth. The question is how many people of wealth will buy their argument.




In 2006, [Warren Buffett] made a commitment to gradually give all of my Berkshire Hathaway stock to philanthropic foundations. I couldn't be happier with that decision.

Now, Bill and Melinda Gates and I are asking hundreds of rich Americans to pledge at least 50% of their wealth to charity. So I think it is fitting that I reiterate my intentions and explain the thinking that lies behind them.



Li Lu's Foreword to Poor Charlie’s Almanack



Willing to translate the foreword into English?

Please email me...
Shai@DardashtiCapital.com



Li Li's Lecture at Columbia University

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Ira Sohn Conference: Speeches

The Ira Sohn Research Conference Foundation, dedicated to the treatment and cure of pediatric cancer and other childhood diseases.


The Ira Sohn Investment Research Conference was founded in 1995 after the untimely passing of Ira Sohn. Sohn was a successful trader on Wall Street who battled cancer and passed away at the age of 29. His courageous battle with cancer inspired his colleagues and friends to launch the annual Ira Sohn Investment Research Conference.

Proceeds from the conference are donated to organizations dedicated to the care and treatment of children with pediatric cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. The organizations served include Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, the Tomorrows Children’s Fund at Hackensack University Medical Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, and ArtWorks, an art therapy program that allows children fighting diseases to express themselves through art.






See also:

Buffett's 1982 Letter Warning Dingell About Derivatives

Forbes has obtained a copy of Buffett's March 5, 1982, letter to Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., laying out the risks of derivatives to the nation that were, of course, largely ignored. In the letter Buffett modestly refers to his background, referencing his previous 25 years spent as a financial analyst, and 30 years "in various aspects of the investment business." He adds, "I currently have the sole responsibility for an equity portfolio that totals over $600 million." It sounds prosaic now: $600 million!



Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting Notes



With much gratitude to:

Please email if have any additional notes. Thank you!

Early Moody's Manuals: Direct Tearsheets



Warren Buffett shared the following quotes in a private talk to Columbia University students in 1993:



"When I got out of Columbia the first place I went to work was a five-person brokerage firm with operations in Omaha. It subscribed to Moody's industrial manual, banks and finance manual and public utilities manual. I went through all
those page by page"

"...I found a little company called Genesse Valley Gas near Rochester. It had 22,000 shares out. It was a public utility that was earning about $5 per share, and the nice thing about it was you could buy it at $5 per share."

"...I found Western Insurance in Fort Scott, Kansas. The price range in Moody's financial manual...was $12-$20. Earnings were $16 a share. I ran an ad in the Fort Scott paper to buy that stock."

"...I found the Union Street Railway, in New Bedford, a bus company. At that time it was selling at about $45 and, as i remember, had $120 a share in cash and no liabilities."


More:


Please call if you are aware of any more early Moody's Manual tearsheets that are interesting. Thank you!

With much gratitude to Kyle Cipperley and Max Olson.

Collection of Benjamin Graham Essays

Link



With appreciation to farnamstreet and Matt Pauls!


Please email if have any additional essays. Thank you!

Recent Reflections